Authenticity and Process Communication
In her December 13 New York Times article, “The Counterfeit Self,” Marina Krakovsky reviewed a fascinating study by psychologists Francesca Gino, Michael Norton and Dan Ariely. These three researchers attempted to study the psychological toll of fooling others, even of we don’t fool ourselves. To do that, they administered a self-graded math test to experimental subjects—half of which thought they were wearing genuine designer eye wear and half of which thought they were wearing cheap knockoffs.
The result? Participants who thought they were wearing counterfeit eye wear were much more likely to cheat. Thirty percent of the women who wore the name-brand sunglasses inflated their true performance; while a whopping 71% of the women who chose counterfeit sunglasses inflated their performance. Says Gino, “When one feels like a fake, he or she is likely to behave like a fake.” Krakovsky hypothesized that other types of fakery could also lead to ethical lapses and quotes Gino as saying, “There are lots of situations on the job where we’re not true to ourselves, and we might not realize there might be unintended consequences.”
How does this correlate to Process Communication? Distress is like wearing counterfeit sunglasses. When we are in distress, we are moving away from our authentic self, away from authentic relationships, away from an honest appraisal of ourselves and others.
First degree distress of the Driver sets the stage for inauthenticity by putting our own, or others’ worth on condition, and believing the myths that “you can make me feel good emotionally,” or “I can make you feel good emotionally.”
In second degree distress, we Mask our authentic feelings and needs, instead attempting to get our psychological needs met with negative attention. When we have our counterfeit sunglasses on, the assumptions we draw about ourselves and others are inaccurate and inauthentic. This leads to poor decision-making, and negative consequences.
The solution is to focus on getting our personal psychological needs met in healthy ways on a daily, weekly, and monthly basis. Doing so allows us to be self-ful, take off our Masks, experience our natural gifts and abilities, and explore other parts of our personalities that allow us to connect more authentically with others.
Many people who come through our communication training seminars argue that it feels inauthentic to adjust their communication and leadership style in order to connect with, and motivate others. “It’s not the real me,” they say, explaining that it’s more important to stay true to oneself than do be shifty and fickle.
Let’s not confuse authentic with comfortable or automatic. Doing what comes naturally means doing what’s always been done, what has been practiced and become habit over time. Although these behavior patterns may have been developed intentionally over time and provide a sense of grounding, habits take very little energy and cause virtually no discomfort. We suggest that because we have all six personality types within us, we can be “true to ourselves” and access any part of our personality. While we may have less energy in the less-visited floors of our personality condominium, they are no less a part of who we are.
We’d like to clarify our understanding of authenticity – which means to be all of who you are, to mobilize all of your potential in order to connect in meaningful and respectful ways with others, even if others don’t share the same natural tendencies.
Our message is simple. Take off your counterfeit sunglasses and be the authentic you! Tend positively to your psychological needs and motivators. And, stretch into less visited parts of your personality to authentically connect with others.
Read other Next Element White Papers
Download PDF Version


Great white paper, Jeff. Adds clarity. As a persister, I can really empathize as I struggle with the “Be sincere and true to who you are” mindset. What’s helped me deal with this internal conflict is to think about the values of 1)honoring others for who they are 2)dedicating myself to effective communication and 3)remembering it’s not about me.
Jeff, I really like what you say what you say about habits (they take very little energy and cause virtually no discomfort). I love my habits and I think it would be great if I could effectively meet every situation with them. But, huh, I’ve noticed they don’t always produce the desired outcome. So I like PCM because it gives me a tool to work in the uncomfortable zone outside of habit. Since both PCM and my habits are just “tools,” the choice of tool doesn’t affect my personal feeling of authenticity.
Leadership skills are learned. Management skills are learned. These separate sets of skills are needed to reach different desired outcomes: managing processess to run smoothly vs. leading change to improve the process. Acquiring any skill requires a period of uncomfortableness. Acquiring leaderhsip communication skills is no different.
The real “communications modification challenge” comes with caring for a spouse with Alzheimer’s Disease. Eliminating comments about shared memories has been the hardest to master.
I suppose it’s workaholic/logic talk to say that the various channels have always just seemed to be (like) speaking different languages. English is my mother tongue, and I can’t express myself as well in other languages, but that is just a learning issue, not a comment on the validity of what I am hearing or trying to communicate (to stretch the metaphor – there could be invalidity if my lack of facility in the 2nd language leads to those wonderful errors of language/cultural novices). Communication is communication, dunh. If I’m not speaking the language my listener will understand, well…. certain sterotypes of Americans speaking English loudly and slowly in other countries come to mind.
Fascinating, as always, to see how the different channels experience this issue and describe it. I can see how my Reactor phase builds on the logical assessment to stress the importance of relating.
My new favorite quote from Virginia Satir is “The meaning of your communication is the response you get. If you get the wrong response, change the way you communicate”.